Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson by Aron Jonason : Difficulty Assessment for Swedish Learners

How difficult is Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson for Swedish learners? We have performed multiple tests on its full text (freely available here) of approximately 38,817, crunched all the numbers for you and present the results below.

Read the Full Text Now for Free!

Difficulty Assessment Summary

We have estimated Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson to have a difficulty score of 73. Here're its scores:

Measure Score
easy difficult (1 - 100)
Overall Difficulty 73% 73
Vocabulary Difficulty 91% 91
Grammatical Difficulty 56% 56

Vocabulary Difficulty: Breakdown

91%

Vocabulary difficulty: 91%

This score has been calculated based on frequency vocabulary (the top most frequently used words in Swedish). It combines various measures of Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson's text analyzed in terms of frequency vocabulary: a plain vocabulary score, frequency-weighted vocabulary score, banded frequency vocabulary scores based on vocabulary of the text falling in the top 1,000 or 2,000 most frequent words, etc. Here's a further breakdown of how often the top most frequently used words in Swedish appear in the full text of Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson:

Vocabulary difficulty breakdown for Göteborgsluft  - Rim och reson: a test for Swedish top frequency vocabulary

We have also calculated the following approximate data on the vocabulary in Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson:

Measure Score
Measure Score
Number of words 38,817
Number of unique words 10,333
Number of recognized words for names/places/other entities 1,479
Number of very rare non-entity words 2,810
Number of sentences 6,167
Average number of words/sentence 6

There is some research suggesting that that you need to know about 98% of a text's vocabulary in order to be able to infer the meaning of unknown words when reading. If true, this means that you would need to know around 10,126 words (where all the forms of the word are still counted as unique words) in Swedish to be able to read Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson without a dictionary and fully understand it.

Grammatical Difficulty: Breakdown

56%

Grammatical difficulty: 56%

Here is the further grammatical comparison on this text. You can find an explanation of all these scores below.

Measure Score
Measure Score
Automated Readability Index 4
Coleman-Liau Index 7
Type/Token Ratio (TTR) 0.266198
Root type/Token Ratio (RTTR) 0.00000685776
Corrected type/Token Ratio (CTTR) 0.00000342888
MTLD Index 75
HDD Index 69
Yule's I Index 82
Lexical Diversity Index (MTLD + HD-D + Yule's I) 75

The type-token ratio (TTR) of Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson is 0.266198. The TTR is the most basic measure of lexical diversity. To calculate it, we divide the number of unique words by the number of words in the text. For example, for this text, the number of unique words is 10,333, while the number of words is 38,817, so the TTR is 10,333 / 38,817 = 0.266198. However, the TTR is a very crude measure, as it is extremely dependent on text length. The longer the text, the lower the TTR is usually going to be, since common words tend to often repeat. Especially since the number of words in this text is more than 1,000, the TTR is not likely to give an accurate measure.

The root type-token ratio (RTTR) and corrected type-token ratio (CTTR) are measures which were suggested by researchers to partially address the problem of TTR's variance on text length. In the RTTR, the number of unique words is divided by a square of the number of words (therefore, 10,333 / (38,817 * 38,817) = 0.00000685776), while in CTTR, it is divided by a square of the number of words, multiplied twice 10,333 / 2 * (38,817 * 38,817) = 0.00000342888). However, these measures are not as easily readable, and also there is a growing body of research asserting that CTTR and RTTR do not effectively address the problems of text length. Therefore, while we do provide the full text's TTR, RTTR and CTTR on this page, these fiqures do not form part of our final calculations.

The Automated Readability Index (ARI) is one readability measure that has been developed by researchers over the years. The formula for calculating the ARI is as follows:
Formula for calculating the Automated Readability Index

The ARI should compute a reading level approximately corresponding to the reader's grade level (assuming the reader undertakes formal education). Thus, for example, a value of 1 is kindergarten level, while a value of 12 or 13 is the last year of school, and 14 is a sophomore at college. The current ARI of this text is 4, making it understandable for 4-grade students at their expected level of education.

The Coleman Liau Index (CLI) is a similar index designed by Meri Coleman and T. L. Liau, and it is supposed to compute the grade level of the reader (thus, for example, sophomore level material would be around grade 14, or year 14 of formal education, while kindergarten / primary school level material would be close to grade 1 in the CLI). The CLI is usually slightly higher than the ARI. The CLI is computed with this formula:
Formula for calculating the Coleman-Liau Readability Index

It is notable that other indexes exist, such as the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease, Gunning-Fog Score, and others, but we have chosen not to include them, since, contrary to the ARI and CLI, such other indexes are based on a syllable count and therefore arguably only work for English and not Swedish.

We compute a further compound lexical diversity index, which should range from 1 to a 100 (with the standard deviation being around 10, and its average value being around 50) - it is 75 in the present case. The compound lexical diversity index consists of the following indexes, averaged out (and also provided in the table above):

  • the Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity (MTLD) index - a measure which is based on computing the TTR for increasingly larger parts of the text until the TTR drops below a certain threshold point (around 0.7 in our case) - in which case, the TTR is reset, and the overall counter is increased; the counter is at the end divided by the number of words in text; as a result, the MTLD does not significantly vary by text length;
  • the Yule's I index (based on Yule's K characteristic inverted) - an index based on the work of the statistician G.U. Yule, who published his index of Frequency Vocabulary in his paper "The statistical study of literary vocabulary"; Yule's I takes into account the number of words in the text, and a compound summed measure of word frequency;
  • the Hypergeometric Distribution D (HD-D) index (based on vocd) - an index which assesses the contribution of each word to the diversity of the text; to calculate such contributions, a hypergeometric distribution is used to compute probabilities of each word appearing in word samples extracted from the text; then such distributions are divided by sample sizes and added up;

Our overall measure of grammatical diversity is based on a combination of the compound lexical diversity index (which includes the MTLD, Yule's I and HD-D indexes), the ARI and CLI, all normalized and given certain weight. The score should normally range from 1 to 100. In this case, the score is 56.

Other Information about Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson by Aron Jonason

We provide you a sample of the text below, however, the full text of the Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson is also available free of charge on our website.

Sample of text:

Utan att fråga efter hvarken namn eller afsikten med besöket, böjde sig gubben ner och upptog en stor kopparplåt, hvilken han presenterade med orden: »se, här ska’ herrn få se på ett kopparmynt från Gustaf Wasas tid; det är annat, det, än nutidens småslantar.» Efter detta öppnade han fönstret, hvilket vette ut i87 mot ett tak, där ögonblickligt en flock sparfvar samlade sig; och var det än smulor, som bestods, visade sig dock »wolthäter» ingalunda vara någon smulgråt. Jag inbjöds nu med en talande gest att stiga närmare och inkom i ett stort rum, gubbens »dagligstuga». Samma bizarra upplag af diverse mötte här blicken. Möblerna voro få samt utgjordes hufvudsakligast af en stor soffa och en chiffonnier, på hvars nerfällda klaff en mängd sedlar lågo. Gubben hade. tydligen blifvit störd i sitt förut omnämnda ...

Top most frequently used words in Göteborgsluft - Rim och reson by Aron Jonason*

Position Word Repetitions Part of all words
Position Word Repetitions Part of all words
1 och 777 2%
2 att 589 1.52%
3 en 498 1.28%
4 473 1.22%
5 det 464 1.2%
6 den 453 1.17%
7 som 436 1.12%
8 han 371 0.96%
9 för 368 0.95%
10 till 366 0.94%
11 af 353 0.91%
12 med 342 0.88%
13 är 322 0.83%
14 jag 307 0.79%
15 sig 285 0.73%
16 ej 274 0.71%
17 var 265 0.68%
18 man 252 0.65%
19 ett 232 0.6%
20 228 0.59%
21 sin 198 0.51%
22 Men 168 0.43%
23 de 158 0.41%
24 om 143 0.37%
25 har 131 0.34%
26 vid 115 0.3%
27 hade 114 0.29%
28 hon 111 0.29%
29 du 108 0.28%
30 kan 107 0.28%
31 nu 107 0.28%
32 95 0.24%
33 icke 93 0.24%
34 än 91 0.23%
35 från 91 0.23%
36 där 90 0.23%
37 När 86 0.22%
38 hans 84 0.22%
39 vi 82 0.21%
40 sitt 79 0.2%
41 här 78 0.2%
42 detta 78 0.2%
43 dag 76 0.2%
44 mig 76 0.2%
45 skulle 75 0.19%
46 HVARJEHANDA 74 0.19%
47 min 74 0.19%
48 aldrig 68 0.18%
49 BRIKOLL 67 0.17%
50 skall 67 0.17%
51 GÖTA 67 0.17%
52 blef 67 0.17%
53 67 0.17%
54 väl 66 0.17%
55 Ty 66 0.17%
56 PAR 66 0.17%
57 sina 65 0.17%
58 kunde 64 0.16%
59 denna 64 0.16%
60 dock 63 0.16%
61 dig 61 0.16%
62 fick 60 0.15%
63 vill 57 0.15%
64 honom 57 0.15%
65 hvilken 52 0.13%
66 ju 51 0.13%
67 vara 51 0.13%
68 ha 51 0.13%
69 vår 50 0.13%
70 dess 49 0.13%
71 TAL 49 0.13%
72 mot 49 0.13%
73 ut 49 0.13%
74 RIMMERIER 49 0.13%
75 nog 48 0.12%
76 andra 48 0.12%
77 alla 47 0.12%
78 47 0.12%
79 gubben 47 0.12%
80 in 47 0.12%
81 får 47 0.12%
82 år 46 0.12%
83 allt 45 0.12%
84 hur 45 0.12%
85 oss 45 0.12%
86 tid 44 0.11%
87 uti 44 0.11%
88 äfven 43 0.11%
89 blott 43 0.11%
90 hvad 43 0.11%
91 se 42 0.11%
92 42 0.11%
93 öfver 41 0.11%
94 göra 41 0.11%
95 gång 41 0.11%
96 mer 41 0.11%
97 dem 40 0.1%
98 något 40 0.1%
99 kom 39 0.1%
100 fått 39 0.1%
101 själf 39 0.1%
102 blir 38 0.1%
103 upp 38 0.1%
104 tiden 37 0.1%
105 inte 37 0.1%
106 måste 36 0.09%
107 under 36 0.09%
108 efter 36 0.09%
109 åt 36 0.09%
110 bli 36 0.09%
111 någon 36 0.09%
112 ingen 35 0.09%
113 gick 35 0.09%
114 går 35 0.09%
115 ur 34 0.09%
116 gör 34 0.09%
117 Barbara 33 0.09%
118 din 31 0.08%
119 voro 31 0.08%
120 sätt 31 0.08%
121 mycket 31 0.08%
122 Blom 29 0.07%
123 komma 29 0.07%
124 annat 29 0.07%
125 några 28 0.07%
126 satt 28 0.07%
127 mitt 27 0.07%
128 endast 27 0.07%
129 hvar 26 0.07%
130 henne 26 0.07%
131 helt 26 0.07%
132 fram 26 0.07%
133 mera 26 0.07%
134 utaf 26 0.07%
135 bör 26 0.07%
136 rätt 26 0.07%
137 Göteborg 25 0.06%
138 många 25 0.06%
139 blifva 25 0.06%
140 utan 25 0.06%
141 snart 25 0.06%
142 dagen 25 0.06%
143 bland 24 0.06%
144 hennes 24 0.06%
145 ifrån 24 0.06%
146 tog 24 0.06%
147 eller 24 0.06%
148 blifvit 24 0.06%
149 sedan 24 0.06%
150 kunna 23 0.06%
151 första 23 0.06%
152 annan 23 0.06%
153 dessa 23 0.06%
154 städse 23 0.06%
155 lätt 22 0.06%
156 ord 22 0.06%
157 GÖTEBORGSLUFT 22 0.06%
158 ännu 22 0.06%
159 genom 22 0.06%
160 gjorde 21 0.05%
161 lär 21 0.05%
162 åter 21 0.05%

This list excludes punctuation or single-letter words, also some different-case repeats of the same words.

If you think the text would be accessible to you, you can read it on our site (click on the cover to access):

Cover of Göteborgsluft  - Rim och reson by Aron Jonason

Other resources and languages

If you like this analysis, you should have a look at out our lists of Swedish short stories and Swedish books.

If you like literature as a means to learn languages - please take a look at our project Interlinear Books. We even have a Swedish Interlinear book available for purchase.