Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap by Petr Kropotkin : Difficulty Assessment for Swedish Learners

How difficult is Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap for Swedish learners? We have performed multiple tests on its full text (freely available here) of approximately 34,533, crunched all the numbers for you and present the results below.

Read the Full Text Now for Free!

Difficulty Assessment Summary

We have estimated Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap to have a difficulty score of 62. Here're its scores:

Measure Score
easy difficult (1 - 100)
Overall Difficulty 62% 62
Vocabulary Difficulty 69% 69
Grammatical Difficulty 56% 56

Vocabulary Difficulty: Breakdown

69%

Vocabulary difficulty: 69%

This score has been calculated based on frequency vocabulary (the top most frequently used words in Swedish). It combines various measures of Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap's text analyzed in terms of frequency vocabulary: a plain vocabulary score, frequency-weighted vocabulary score, banded frequency vocabulary scores based on vocabulary of the text falling in the top 1,000 or 2,000 most frequent words, etc. Here's a further breakdown of how often the top most frequently used words in Swedish appear in the full text of Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap:

Vocabulary difficulty breakdown for Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap: a test for Swedish top frequency vocabulary

We have also calculated the following approximate data on the vocabulary in Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap:

Measure Score
Measure Score
Number of words 34,533
Number of unique words 6,798
Number of recognized words for names/places/other entities 973
Number of very rare non-entity words 1,382
Number of sentences 5,553
Average number of words/sentence 6

There is some research suggesting that that you need to know about 98% of a text's vocabulary in order to be able to infer the meaning of unknown words when reading. If true, this means that you would need to know around 6,662 words (where all the forms of the word are still counted as unique words) in Swedish to be able to read Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap without a dictionary and fully understand it.

Grammatical Difficulty: Breakdown

56%

Grammatical difficulty: 56%

Here is the further grammatical comparison on this text. You can find an explanation of all these scores below.

Measure Score
Measure Score
Automated Readability Index 7
Coleman-Liau Index 11
Type/Token Ratio (TTR) 0.196855
Root type/Token Ratio (RTTR) 0.00000570049
Corrected type/Token Ratio (CTTR) 0.00000285025
MTLD Index 62
HDD Index 63
Yule's I Index 67
Lexical Diversity Index (MTLD + HD-D + Yule's I) 64

The type-token ratio (TTR) of Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap is 0.196855. The TTR is the most basic measure of lexical diversity. To calculate it, we divide the number of unique words by the number of words in the text. For example, for this text, the number of unique words is 6,798, while the number of words is 34,533, so the TTR is 6,798 / 34,533 = 0.196855. However, the TTR is a very crude measure, as it is extremely dependent on text length. The longer the text, the lower the TTR is usually going to be, since common words tend to often repeat. Especially since the number of words in this text is more than 1,000, the TTR is not likely to give an accurate measure.

The root type-token ratio (RTTR) and corrected type-token ratio (CTTR) are measures which were suggested by researchers to partially address the problem of TTR's variance on text length. In the RTTR, the number of unique words is divided by a square of the number of words (therefore, 6,798 / (34,533 * 34,533) = 0.00000570049), while in CTTR, it is divided by a square of the number of words, multiplied twice 6,798 / 2 * (34,533 * 34,533) = 0.00000285025). However, these measures are not as easily readable, and also there is a growing body of research asserting that CTTR and RTTR do not effectively address the problems of text length. Therefore, while we do provide the full text's TTR, RTTR and CTTR on this page, these fiqures do not form part of our final calculations.

The Automated Readability Index (ARI) is one readability measure that has been developed by researchers over the years. The formula for calculating the ARI is as follows:
Formula for calculating the Automated Readability Index

The ARI should compute a reading level approximately corresponding to the reader's grade level (assuming the reader undertakes formal education). Thus, for example, a value of 1 is kindergarten level, while a value of 12 or 13 is the last year of school, and 14 is a sophomore at college. The current ARI of this text is 7, making it understandable for 7-grade students at their expected level of education.

The Coleman Liau Index (CLI) is a similar index designed by Meri Coleman and T. L. Liau, and it is supposed to compute the grade level of the reader (thus, for example, sophomore level material would be around grade 14, or year 14 of formal education, while kindergarten / primary school level material would be close to grade 1 in the CLI). The CLI is usually slightly higher than the ARI. The CLI is computed with this formula:
Formula for calculating the Coleman-Liau Readability Index

It is notable that other indexes exist, such as the Flesch-Kincaid Reading Ease, Gunning-Fog Score, and others, but we have chosen not to include them, since, contrary to the ARI and CLI, such other indexes are based on a syllable count and therefore arguably only work for English and not Swedish.

We compute a further compound lexical diversity index, which should range from 1 to a 100 (with the standard deviation being around 10, and its average value being around 50) - it is 64 in the present case. The compound lexical diversity index consists of the following indexes, averaged out (and also provided in the table above):

  • the Measure of Textual Lexical Diversity (MTLD) index - a measure which is based on computing the TTR for increasingly larger parts of the text until the TTR drops below a certain threshold point (around 0.7 in our case) - in which case, the TTR is reset, and the overall counter is increased; the counter is at the end divided by the number of words in text; as a result, the MTLD does not significantly vary by text length;
  • the Yule's I index (based on Yule's K characteristic inverted) - an index based on the work of the statistician G.U. Yule, who published his index of Frequency Vocabulary in his paper "The statistical study of literary vocabulary"; Yule's I takes into account the number of words in the text, and a compound summed measure of word frequency;
  • the Hypergeometric Distribution D (HD-D) index (based on vocd) - an index which assesses the contribution of each word to the diversity of the text; to calculate such contributions, a hypergeometric distribution is used to compute probabilities of each word appearing in word samples extracted from the text; then such distributions are divided by sample sizes and added up;

Our overall measure of grammatical diversity is based on a combination of the compound lexical diversity index (which includes the MTLD, Yule's I and HD-D indexes), the ARI and CLI, all normalized and given certain weight. The score should normally range from 1 to 100. In this case, the score is 56.

Other Information about Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap by Petr Kropotkin

We provide you a sample of the text below, however, the full text of the Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap is also available free of charge on our website.

Sample of text:

De kommo till t. o. m. så långt att de gåvo sin regeringshierarki karaktären av ett prästerskap. Även skilde sig Saint-Simonisterna från kommunisterna i den rent individuella del de tillskrevo varje produktör i gemensamhetspreduktionen. Oaktat de utmärkta arbeten i politisk ekonomi, som flera av dem gjort, hade de ännu ej kommit till att förstå produktionen av rikedomarna såsom en social omständighet. Om de hade gjort det skulle de nödvändigtvis förts till att förstå att det är omöjligt att bestämma den del som bör tillskrivas var och en i helheten av de producerade ...

Top most frequently used words in Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap by Petr Kropotkin*

Position Word Repetitions Part of all words
Position Word Repetitions Part of all words
1 och 1,119 3.24%
2 att 1,012 2.93%
3 av 820 2.37%
4 som 753 2.18%
5 den 611 1.77%
6 en 605 1.75%
7 de 514 1.49%
8 det 459 1.33%
9 för 437 1.27%
10 till 308 0.89%
11 ej 300 0.87%
12 291 0.84%
13 är 280 0.81%
14 om 263 0.76%
15 ett 246 0.71%
16 sig 230 0.67%
17 med 215 0.62%
18 eller 191 0.55%
19 man 160 0.46%
20 vi 157 0.45%
21 från 153 0.44%
22 denna 153 0.44%
23 dessa 141 0.41%
24 sin 131 0.38%
25 alla 131 0.38%
26 122 0.35%
27 än 121 0.35%
28 under 118 0.34%
29 skulle 112 0.32%
30 genom 103 0.3%
31 103 0.3%
32 mot 101 0.29%
33 ha 99 0.29%
34 dem 98 0.28%
35 utan 97 0.28%
36 var 94 0.27%
37 detta 92 0.27%
38 Men 89 0.26%
39 staten 85 0.25%
40 samma 85 0.25%
41 har 84 0.24%
42 andra 84 0.24%
43 han 79 0.23%
44 sina 79 0.23%
45 dess 78 0.23%
46 kunna 77 0.22%
47 kan 76 0.22%
48 mycket 68 0.2%
49 efter 67 0.19%
50 oss 67 0.19%
51 varje 67 0.19%
52 äro 67 0.19%
53 mer 66 0.19%
54 såsom 63 0.18%
55 ännu 62 0.18%
56 annat 59 0.17%
57 göra 59 0.17%
58 vid 58 0.17%
59 bli 57 0.17%
60 nu 57 0.17%
61 deras 56 0.16%
62 hans 52 0.15%
63 över 51 0.15%
64 hos 51 0.15%
65 redan 50 0.14%
66 sitt 50 0.14%
67 skall 49 0.14%
68 nya 48 0.14%
69 alltid 48 0.14%
70 se 47 0.14%
71 politiska 47 0.14%
72 hade 46 0.13%
73 också 46 0.13%
74 sociala 46 0.13%
75 sätt 45 0.13%
76 hela 44 0.13%
77 första 44 0.13%
78 blev 44 0.13%
79 utveckling 43 0.12%
80 mellan 42 0.12%
81 måste 42 0.12%
82 gång 40 0.12%
83 blott 39 0.11%
84 tid 39 0.11%
85 säga 37 0.11%
86 vilken 37 0.11%
87 även 37 0.11%
88 vara 36 0.1%
89 således 35 0.1%
90 såväl 35 0.1%
91 mänskliga 35 0.1%
92 liv 35 0.1%
93 voro 35 0.1%
94 stora 34 0.1%
95 våra 33 0.1%
96 skola 33 0.1%
97 nuvarande 33 0.1%
98 ekonomiska 33 0.1%
99 idéer 32 0.09%
100 revolutionen 32 0.09%
101 två 32 0.09%
102 samhället 32 0.09%
103 senare 32 0.09%
104 vilka 32 0.09%
105 revolution 32 0.09%
106 idé 32 0.09%
107 metod 32 0.09%
108 icke 32 0.09%
109 allt 31 0.09%
110 år 31 0.09%
111 studiet 31 0.09%
112 lagar 31 0.09%
113 fakta 31 0.09%
114 statens 30 0.09%
115 institutioner 30 0.09%
116 samhälle 30 0.09%
117 någon 30 0.09%
118 gjort 30 0.09%
119 verk 30 0.09%
120 ord 29 0.08%
121 del 29 0.08%
122 sedan 29 0.08%
123 anarkismen 29 0.08%
124 ursprung 29 0.08%
125 vetenskapliga 29 0.08%
126 arbete 28 0.08%
127 vår 28 0.08%
128 Frankrike 28 0.08%
129 huru 28 0.08%
130 sidan 28 0.08%
131 skilda 28 0.08%
132 behov 28 0.08%
133 aldrig 27 0.08%
134 anarkistiska 27 0.08%
135 auktoritet 27 0.08%
136 etc 27 0.08%
137 några 26 0.08%
138 där 26 0.08%
139 vetenskapen 25 0.07%
140 bland 25 0.07%
141 Internationalen 25 0.07%
142 lag 25 0.07%
143 dag 25 0.07%
144 komma 25 0.07%
145 1848 25 0.07%
146 kunde 24 0.07%
147 själva 24 0.07%
148 moderna 24 0.07%
149 människan 24 0.07%
150 emedan 24 0.07%
151 regering 24 0.07%
152 gjorde 24 0.07%
153 många 24 0.07%
154 idéen 23 0.07%
155 ny 23 0.07%
156 däri 23 0.07%
157 annan 23 0.07%
158 väl 23 0.07%
159 studera 23 0.07%
160 bör 23 0.07%
161 livet 22 0.06%
162 inflytande 22 0.06%
163 åt 22 0.06%
164 finna 22 0.06%
165 naturen 22 0.06%
166 filosofi 22 0.06%
167 helt 22 0.06%
168 absolut 22 0.06%
169 mindre 22 0.06%
170 franska 22 0.06%
171 blir 21 0.06%
172 riktning 21 0.06%
173 rätt 21 0.06%
174 jorden 21 0.06%
175 principer 21 0.06%
176 gav 21 0.06%
177 Fourier 21 0.06%
178 1793 21 0.06%
179 människorna 21 0.06%
180 former 21 0.06%
181 isynnerhet 21 0.06%

This list excludes punctuation or single-letter words, also some different-case repeats of the same words.

If you think the text would be accessible to you, you can read it on our site (click on the cover to access):

Cover of Anarkism och Modern Vetenskap by Petr Kropotkin

Other resources and languages

If you like this analysis, you should have a look at out our lists of Swedish short stories and Swedish books.

If you like literature as a means to learn languages - please take a look at our project Interlinear Books. We even have a Swedish Interlinear book available for purchase.